For years I have been writing about the implications about belief systems and organizations like Planned Parenthood. What a person believes has implications far beyond the present, especially when governments get involved in implementing laws for one thing and then end up applying them to everything far beyond their intended purpose.

Consider RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. This government-enforcement law was designed to go after organized crime. Sounds like a good thing. But once politicians and judicial activists started mining it for open doors, loopholes, and flexible interpretations, RICO became a wax nose that has been used to silence political opponents, from the Hells Angels and Major League Baseball to pro-life advocates who were against abortion on demand.

Now the truth is coming out about abortion and Planned Parenthood. It all began when Florida legislators were “considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion.” That in itself is an indictment of legalized abortion and the states and courts that have legalized the bloody procedure. But it shouldn’t surprise us since a majority of people have cast moral acuity to the four winds.

During a committee hearing a Planned Parenthood official came out of the closet and supported killing a baby born alive after a botched attempt by the “doctor” to kill him.

“Alisa Laport Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.”

There it is: The long-tail implications of abortion. What difference does a few seconds outside his mother’s body make? A few seconds before and the baby could be killed legally. Once born, however, the baby is protected by the law, at least that’s what Florida legislators hoped to pass into law.

Rep. Jim Boyd was horrified at Snow’s nonchalant admission.

“So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because I’m almost in disbelief. If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that is struggling for life?”

Here was Snow’s response:

“We believe that any decision that’s made should be left up to the woman, her family, and the physician.”

How could she say this publicly? Because she’s been following what’s going on at the Supreme Court and how the homosexual lobby has turned the majority of Americans into moral zombies.

The law doesn’t matter anymore. It’s only what people decided to do.

It gets worse:

“Rep. Daniel Davis then asked Snow, ‘What happens in a situation where a baby is alive, breathing on a table, moving. What do your physicians do at that point?’

“‘I do not have that information,’ Snow replied. ‘I am not a physician, I am not an abortion provider. So I do not have that information.’”

“I am not a physician”? What kind of answer is that? A dog would get more consideration from this woman. In fact, if a news story got out that Snow did not help a just-born puppy that was struggling to live, she would be run out of town and people would be calling for the end of tax-payer subsidies to Planned Parenthood.

Does Nuremberg Trials come to mind?