Liberals Prove they are Anti-Science
How many times have we heard liberals shout it from the roof tops that conservatives are anti-science? It’s like the war on women meme. There’s no evidence supporting either claim, but they keep using them since if you repeat a lie often enough some (many?) people will end up believing it.
In reality, it’s liberals who are often anti-science. Evolutionists claim that life came from non-life (spontaneous generation), that the cosmos came into existence out of nothing, and that we share our DNA with a variety of subspecies like chimpanzees and pigs.
“‘Humans evolved after a female chimpanzee mated with a pig.” The theory of evolution gets even more bizarre. Evolutionists can’t account for matter, organized information to make the matter walk, talk, think, invent, and love, but one leading geneticist offers the hypothesis that ‘the human species began as the hybrid offspring of a male pig and a female chimpanzee.’”
Read more: “Meet Your Ancestor the ChimPigZee.”
Then there’s the whole man-made climate change, global warming, climate crisis “science” debate that liberals tell us is over. They don’t want a debate since the facts would come out that the science behind the claims is bogus or at least open to interpretation.
Trending: ‘Socialism for Thee but not for Me’
Related to this is the claim that the “former” Bruce Jenner is now Caitlyn Jenner. The absurdity of all of this is how quickly Bruce Jenner is now referred to as “Caitlyn” and is addressed as “she.”
It’s very much like the theory of evolution called “punctuated equilibrium.” The credit for the theory is given to Stephen J. Gould and Niles Eldridge based on a 1972 article they wrote on the subject which states that “evolution of species proceeds in a characteristic pattern of relative stability for long periods of time interspersed with much shorter periods during which many species become extinct and new species emerge.”
Maybe this is how leaps in evolutionary development occurred. Some animals decided to transform themselves into a new species.
It’s similar to the hopeful monster hypothesis “which suggests that major evolutionary transformations have occurred in large leaps between species due to macromutations.”
It seems that many today are willing to argue against biology and declare people like Bruce Jenner a new macromutated species. For 65 years Bruce was a “he,” now he’s a “she.” Impossible and contrary to all the science we know about biology, physiology, DNA, and sex. Anybody who calls Bruce Jenner “she,” like Sen. Lindsey Graham who refers to Bruce Jenner as “Caitlyn” most likely to get the so-called “transgender” vote since he’s running for President, is anti-science.
Matthew Barber writes:
“Johns Hopkins Hospital was the pioneer in ‘gender reassignment surgery.’ It now refuses to perform the procedures. Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the hospital’s former psychiatrist-in-chief and current distinguished service professor of psychiatry, has noted that, as even the left-leaning APA reluctantly acknowledges, transgenderism is a ‘mental disorder.’ The idea of a ‘sex change’ is ‘biologically impossible,’ he observes.”
Read more: “One Screwball Jenner-ation.”
I was never much of a Monty Python fan. But this clip from The Life of Brian probably was not that funny in 1979 because the content of the skit was so absurd (see short video below). But now . . .
Stan: I want to have babies.
Reg: You want to have babies?!?!
Stan: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
Reg: But … you can’t HAVE babies!
Stan: Don’t you oppress me!
Reg: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the fetus gonna gestate? You gonna keep it in a box?