Check out this 1943 Film that Takes on Political Corruption
Most of us have heard of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939), about a naïve Senator who ends up taking on the establishment. It’s a good film. It stars Jimmy Stewart and Jean Arthur.
It’s one of AMC’s Top 100 films.
It was not popular with the political establishment crowd when it first came out:
The wonderfully-acted, absorbing and human film was popular at the box-office and critically successful too. However, the film caused some controversy and pressure was brought to bear to hinder its release (two months after the outbreak of WWII in Europe), due to the fact that Capra’s film was propagandistic, depicted political corruption, and appeared to paint an anti-democratic picture of the US government and its inner workings. But the film also called for faith in traditional American values of patriotism and faith in the people, and provided an educational lesson in how bills are passed through Congress.
Trending: What’s Happened to Ann Coulter?
A little known film, not as well acted as Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, and with no major stars, has a wonderful scene that sums up the importance of citizenship, electoral participation, and overturning political corruption.
The closing courtroom scene is a great summary of why political participation is so important.
Morgan is Supreme Court Justice John Josephus Grant who finishes with the final case of the year and heads off for a hunting vacation in the out-of-the-way town of Crown Port.
There he sees political corruption first hand. Hiding his identity, he assists an inexperienced lawyer who’s running for mayor but is ground into political fodder by the political machine operated by the mayor and a bought-off judge.
Through some legal maneuvering, Grant and his young legal protégé swear out arrest warrants for the mayor and his enforcement thugs. But it’s the short speech that Judge Grant offers that makes watching A Stranger in Town worthwhile, including his comments on being a citizen. Today’s Supreme Court justices could learn a few lessons as well:
Mr. Connison, you have asked by what right I have interfered in this situation. You still want an answer? . . . It’s only right that you should know why I, a stranger, have become involved in your affairs. Believe me, it’s not because I am a justice of the Supreme Court. It’s because, like all of you here, I’m a citizen of this country. That is no little honor. Men have fought revolutions and died to be called citizen.
As citizens, we carry a burning responsibility. It means when we elect men to public office we cannot do it as lightly as we flip a coin. It means that after we’ve elected them, we can’t sit back and say “Our job is done. What they do now doesn’t concern us.” That philosophy of indifference is what the enemies of decent government want. If we allow them to have their way and grow strong and vicious, then the heroic struggle which welded thousands of lovely towns like this into a great nation means nothing. Then we are not citizens . . . We’re traitors.
The great liberties by which we live have been bought with blood. The kind of government we get is the kind of government we want. Government ‘of the people, by the people’ can mean any kind of government. It’s our duty to make it only one kind . . . uncorrupted, free, united. I believe, Mayor Connison, I’ve answered your question.