Opinion

The Midterms: “Free Stuff” or Freedom?

In previous articles, I’ve mentioned that we really wouldn’t need a wall to protect our borders if we did not live in a massive and growing welfare state. The great migration to the United States that my Italian grandparents took advantage of happened prior to the income tax, Social Security, a federal department of education, Medicare, Aid to Families of Dependent Children, and a myriad of other wealth transfer agencies.

We can’t blame people who want to come to the United States for our welfare system. It’s a system that the people who are citizens support and take advantage of. Dr. Gary North writes:

Some people think that the big problem with illegal immigrants is that they are taking advantage of the welfare rolls. I’m sure a lot of them are. Whose fault is that? It’s the fault of the Anglos, who created the welfare system. It wasn’t created by illegal Mexican immigrants. It began in the New Deal. It was promoted by graduates of the Ivy League universities. All of this was invented by educated people, and it was supported by grassroots Democrats who used the programs to get elected after 1930. The shock troops of the welfare state are not Mexicans. They are Anglos.

What is the biggest problem with illegal immigrants? Gangs. If the United States tomorrow reversed all of the drug laws, how long would the Hispanic gangs survive? Not very long. They wouldn’t be making it big on prostitution, gambling, and petty crime. They make big it on the drug trade. That’s where the billions of dollars are. The whole system of the drug cartels in Latin America relies on demand, and the demand comes from Anglos in the United States. That’s where the money is.

Trending: Rabbi Warns of Biblical Gog and Magog War in Israel

Take away the welfare system and break up the gangs related to the drug cartels, and the two biggest arguments against illegal immigrants disappear.

Dr. North’s article is an interesting and informative read that you won’t read elsewhere. He closes his article with the following:

Any conservative who gets in a dither over amnesty, but who is unwilling to eliminate the welfare state, has his priorities messed up. His ethics can be summarized in this moral axiom: “Illegal immigrants should not have access to our loot. We stole it fair and square.”

The following article by Jerry Newcombe reinforces the point that socialism — a system that’s been in place for decades — does not and cannot work.

_______________________

It sounds like a cliché, but this may well be the most important mid-term election in our lifetime. On the ballot, at least indirectly, will be socialism. Will Americans choose so-called “free stuff” or freedom?

I say so-called “free stuff” because there’s nothing free. Somebody has to pay for it.

A rising star of the left, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is the poster child for the “free stuff” (versus freedom) agenda. She surprisingly won the primary against a ten-term U.S. Congressman in New York City. Her platform calls for Medicare for All and tuition-free college and trade schools.

Such political promises sound good. But what are the realities? Take the example of increased government control of our health care.

Economist Steve Moore of FreedomWorks and the Heritage Foundation wrote recently in the Washington Times: “Americans don’t have to imagine what a government-run system would look like. We have one that already covers millions of Americans. It is called the VA health system. Our veterans die in the waiting lines and the hospitals often provide shoddy levels of care—to the very people who have earned through their service and sacrifices the best care in the world.”

These promises of free stuff from the government are empty promises, notes Mike Farris, the CEO of the Alliance Defending Freedom, in a recent interview with D. James Kennedy Ministries-Television. “Well, it never works. They’re being sold a lie. You want free college? Yeah, I want free college, everyone wants free college. But they have to recognize that somebody has to pay for it, and frankly there’s not enough somebodies around. If we took all the assets of all the billionaires in the country … it would pay about 6 months of the Federal government deficit. That’s it. 6 months and it’s gone.”

Nonetheless, recent polls show that more Democrats prefer socialism over capitalism … and that’s especially true for younger people — they identify with socialism more than with free enterprise.

In an article for The Stream (10/29/18), Rob Schwarzwalder, a Senior Lecturer at Regent University, cites a recent study on the hard-core pro-socialists in our country: “Just eight percent of Americans identify as ‘progressive activists.’ They tend to be ‘younger, highly engaged, secular, cosmopolitan, angry.’ They ‘reject traditional sources of authority and privilege and focus on rectifying historical injustices.’”

That vocal minority has certainly captured the hearts and minds of many young people today. David Barton, the founder and director of WallBuilders, told our television audience recently that in 5500 years of recorded history, “you cannot point to any socialistic nation that has increased freedom and increased prosperity for the people. Yet right now seventy-five percent of students in college support socialism and think it’s the best form of government. Now there’s nothing historically you can point to, there’s nothing statistically you can point to; but that’s what they’ve been taught.”

What’s worse is that if these people don’t get their way, they are liable to throw a tantrum. We often see that in the form of riots in the streets. Barton observes, “They’ve also been taught that if people disagree with what we’re telling you, you need not tolerate that. You need to stand up; you need to go after them, you call them bigots. So we know that with college students and graduates, fifty-three percent do not support free speech and nineteen percent of college students right now think that violence is an acceptable response to speech they disagree with. Now that’s what we’ve been teaching in the classrooms.”

In the Ten Commandments, God teaches us that we shall not steal. That is divine sanction for private property. The government should likewise not steal. That is ultimately what socialism is: government theft from citizen A to give to citizen B. The Decalogue also condemns coveting. Yet socialism — the promise of “free stuff” — is essentially the politics of envy. Take from the rich and give to the poor.

The Bible teaches us to help the needy. That is all voluntary. That is the church’s job. When the government gets involved in the “charity business,” it is not only wasteful and undermines the family, human dignity, and self-reliance; but ultimately it can end up becoming tyrannical. Venezuela is a textbook case of this. That Latin American nation went from one of the naturally wealthiest nations in our hemisphere to a complete basket case.

But is socialism coming, like it or not, via the “blue wave” supposedly coming in the mid-terms? Barton advises, “The wave is going to be what you decide it to be when you walk in that booth and when other Christians like you walk into that booth. If they would vote conservative, biblical, constitutional values, that will be the wave that everyone will be talking about the morning after the elections.”

###

Jerry Newcombe, D.Min., is an on-air host/senior producer for D. James Kennedy Ministries. He has written/co-written 30 books, e.g., The Unstoppable Jesus Christ, American Amnesia: Is American Paying the Price for Forgetting God?, What If Jesus Had Never Been Born? (w/ D. James Kennedy) & the bestseller, George Washington’s Sacred Fire (w/ Peter Lillback)

You can contact Dr. Newcombe at —

DJKM.org

@NewcombeJerry

www.jerrynewcombe.com

Previous post

The Passage of 50 Years: Was 1968 Worse than 2018?

Next post

Bad Meme 'Logic' on Full Display


Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.