Is There Such a Thing as ‘Sexual Assault’ in an Atheistic Evolutionary World?
Many Leftist men are being accused of sexual impropriety, manly, sexual assault in all shapes and forms. But are they really doing anything that’s morally wrong? Maybe they were born that way like homosexuals who keep claiming that they were born with a particular sexual identity. Transgaenderers assault themselves as they under the knife and have their male or female sexual organs removed, take hormones to assault their body’s sexual hormonal output, and identify as the opposite sex.
If it’s OK to self-identify at Brown University University as “persons of color,” then why is it wrong to identify as a sexual aggressor since Brown and all major universities teach evolution as a scientific fact, and evolution teaches that we have evolved because of sexual assault.
More about that below.
This site lists and defines dozens of sexual identities, everything from
agender – adj. : a person with no (or very little) connection to the traditional system of gender, no personal alignment with the concepts of either man or woman, and/or someone who sees themselves as existing without gender. Sometimes called gender neutrois, gender neutral, or genderless.
To ways to define a person’s sexual identity:
ze / zir / “zee”, “zerr” or “zeer”/ – alternate pronouns that are gender neutral and preferred by some trans* people. They replace “he” and “she” and “his” and “hers” respectively. Alternatively some people who are not comfortable/do not embrace he/she use the plural pronoun “they/their” as a gender neutral singular pronoun.
Facebook has a list of 51 Gender Options to choose from.
The goal is to indoctrinate children into believing that sex is not objective. This could mean that the person being “assaulted” sexually is misidentifying the action. Millennials are in a quandary over trying to find the moral basis for actions. They act out of emotion and self-identity. But if everyone does this, then there is no objective morality.
You see, it’s all about what a person “identifies” as. And that identity can’t be challenged. In some locales, to use the proper identifying pronoun can get you fired from your job or fined for your refusal to acknowledge someone else’s chosen gender identity.
I’m just adding one more to the list it’s the S/A identity. These people identify as sexual assaulters. It’s all based on atheistic evolutionary science. We’re animals. That’s what the textbooks say. Let’s begin with the atheism. Richard Dawkins, one of the high priests of the New Atheism, has written the following:
The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at bottom no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind, pitiless indifference. DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music. ((Richard Dawkins, River Out of Eden (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1995), 133.))
This means there no foundation for morality in matter-only evolutionary theory. “DNA neither knows nor cares.” That means your DNA doesn’t care about my DNA. In the end, it’s whose DNA wins. Harvey Weinstein and Matt Lauer. They both are only dancing to their DNA’s music.
I would love for a defense attorney to take up this scientific approach as a way to prove how evolution has infected everything. There is no way to account for morality if what the universities are teaching about our origin is true, or more accurately, shoved down people’s throats. If you consider the implications of Darwinism, “you are faced with a cold new world, stripped of souls and angels. Darwin’s universal acid eats up everything in its path: Human life and intelligence and free will originated from the random interactions of mindless forces. The creationists are right to fear ‘this view of life’—it leaves nothing of God or Satan in its wake.”1
In what way is assaulting women (or anyone) morally wrong if we have “originated from the random interactions of mindless forces”? Sexual assault is in the makeup of our evolved selves. We operate in terms of mindless forces. We’ve descended from sexual predators in our evolutionary past.
Randy Thornhill, a biologist, and Craig T. Palmer, an anthropologist, attempt to demonstrate in their book A Natural History of Rape (also see here) that evolutionary principles explain rape as a “genetically developed strategy sustained over generations of human life because it is a kind of sexual selection — a successful reproductive strategy.”2
If evolution is true, rape is natural. Without assault, there is no rape. How do atheist evolutionists account for the moral evil of sexual assault and rape?