You may have seen the article that milk is now racist. It’s not racist because it’s white; it’s racist because of calcium and the way non-whites assimilate it and government nutrition guidelines.

The Mother Jones article [see here] states that not only is milk non-beneficial to Africans, but following the guidelines may actually be detrimental to their health. There is a strong correlation to calcium consumption and an increased risk of prostate cancer, unproportionally affecting African men. Furthermore, both black children and adults generally secrete less calcium on a daily basis than white people, making them less dependent upon milk.

How long have blacks, whites, and browns been drinking milk? According to this article, people have been drinking milk for 7500 years, in Europe and Africa. “[T]he National Medical Association, the nation’s oldest and largest organization of African-American physicians, recommends that we consume three to four servings of low-fat dairy every day.” Of course, these doctors have been duped by the white man.

Here’s the “science” that makes encouraging everyone to drink some milk to be a form of racism. It’s from University of North Texas evolutionary historian Constance Hilliard:

“[T]he federal government’s dietary recommendations don’t account for such [racial] distinctions. And that omission, she says, amounts to something like discrimination. ‘What has happened is the medical community has universalized the particular biology of [Caucasians].'” (The College Fix)

Milk may or may not be good for everyone. I get that. But to claim that promoting the consumption of milk and other dairy products is discrimination and racism are just more ways to divide Americans racially and to make “white people” feel guilty.

“If you’re particularly concerned about your diet, consult a physician. Don’t rely on the feds for guidance; they’ve bungled dietary recommendations before, after all.” But let’s not be stupid.

So what’s next on the “it’s racist” agenda? I hate to bring it up since someone reading this article might take it seriously and ruin an industry and a sport: the game of pool.

There’s one white ball, the cue ball, and 15 colored balls. Here’s the really bad part. In a game of  Eightball, the object is to eliminate all the colored balls in order to hunt down and sink the black ball. There are mixed race balls as well: the striped balls.

Sure enough; it’s already been suggested:

So basically, the objective of the game is for ‘The White Ball to knock all of the Coloured Balls off the table’. If the Black Ball is sunk the game is Immediately OVER. Yet the White Ball returns again and again. Now to a closed mind this seems normal, however to me (and this IS just MY opinion) this seems racist. (Above Top Secret)

The Music Man may have had it all in mind.

You got one, two, three, four, five, six pockets in a table.
Pockets that mark the diff’rence
Between a gentleman and a bum,
With a capital “B,”
And that rhymes with “P” and that stands for pool! (MetroLyrics)

But what about bowling? The ball is usually black and the pins are white with red necks. You see, “racism” cuts both ways. Being “in the black” is good. Being “in the red” is bad. Is accounting against Native Americans?