Democrat Congressional Candidate Wants to Control How Many Children You Have
The Democrat Party is even more extreme than we thought. Nearly every Democrat in Congress supports a law that allows women to kill their unborn babies while shedding crocodile tears over illegal immigrant children being separated from their parents (or drug and child traffickers) until legal status can be determined.
The Democrat Party (and not a few Republicans) support the redefinition of the family that includes all types of bizarre gender choices including the claim that people can actually choose their sex. Of course, to do this they have to take hormones and lop off their genitals and go through reconstructive surgery. If you disagree with a person’s chosen sex and use the wrong pronoun you could be fined or lose your job.
New Yorkers voted for a self-identified Socialist. One of the reasons we’re seeing illegals flooding into the United States is because of the failed socialist policies in their native countries. It’s not that they don’t like socialism; it’s that over time socialistic regimes run out of money. Since the US has loads of money and many socialist-like programs, many want the security that socialism promises.
In time, if the Democrat party embraces the new socialism, our nation will suffer a similar fate as other failed socialist regimes.
This is the madness of the Democrat Party.
But it’s worse than we thought. Scott Wallace is a liberal millionaire candidate running for Congress in Pennsylvania. He has donated massive amounts of money to population control groups.
Such groups have advocated for taxing parents “to the hilt” for having more than two children, calling it “irresponsible breeding,” and said abortion is “a highly effective weapon” to combat overpopulation.
Wallace, grandson of a former vice president who’s running as a Democrat in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District against Republican incumbent Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, has used the Wallace Global Fund to give out nearly $7 million to population control groups since 1997. (Fox News)
The ZPG movement has been targeting “irresponsible breeding” since 1968. Paul Ehrlich, who co-founded the ZPG and authored the now debunked book The Population Bomb, “once called abortion ‘a highly effective weapon in the armory of population control.’”
Here’s the really scary part, if the Democrat Party isn’t already scary:
Wallace’s fund also gave $20,000 in 2010 to the Center for the Advancement of the Steady State Economy (CASSE), a group that sees the economic growth as undesirable and instead supports an economy with “stable or mildly fluctuating levels” and a society where birth rates equal death rates.
Who will determine how to stabilize (equalize) population rates with death rates? People like Wallace through the agency of the State. If there are too many children being born, the State will deny women a license to have children. Don’t believe me? It’s not a new idea.
Herman Daly, a board member of CASSE, “advocated issuing reproduction licenses, allowing women to have only two children, unless they buy the license for more children from other women. Daly called it the ‘best plan yet offered’ to limit population growth.”
What if enough children are not being born? Will the government mandate that certain women become breeders? Think The Handmaid’s Tale where an oppressive Leftist dictatorship controls population “balance” by designating certain women to breed for the State, a more likely scenario than the one author Margaret Atwood and the Hulu production depict.
Of course, when the State is given the authority and power to make these types of decisions, only the people the State chooses to have children will be chosen. I can guarantee you that the only people who will be given a license to breed are those who love Big Brother.
When you think of someone like Scott Wallace in Congress, think China’s one-child policy and the 1997 film ‘Gattaca’ that presents “a vision of a future society driven by eugenics where potential children are conceived through genetic selection to ensure they possess the best hereditary traits of their parents.” (Wikipedia)
The difference will be that more than good genes will be considered. Having the right ideology will be part of the State’s selection process.