Bernie Sanders Doesn’t Know Much About Robin Hood

Bernie Sanders thought it was a good idea to debate Ted Cruz. It did not go well for Bernie. Not only doesn’t he know anything about economics, he doesn’t know much about history. Leftists like Sanders love to use the story of Robin Hood to make a case for wealth confiscation of working people.

“In Bernie’s analogy,” Cruz said, “it is the Democrats who are King John and the Sheriff of Nottingham. And Robin Hood is saying: ‘Tax collectors, stop hammering people who are struggling, who are laboring in the fields, who are working. Stop taking it to the castle to give out to your buddies.'”

The media are equally ignorant of the Robin Hood story.

I saw a lot of articles that described President Obama’s call for “a $175 billion tax cut for the middle class, faster and cheaper broadband internet, a week of paid sick leave, discounted mortgages paid for by raising taxes on the rich and inheritances” as Robin Hood economic policy. Politico got it wrong with this article headline: “5 things about Barack Obama’s Robin Hood tax plan.” There’s nothing Robin Hoody about it.

This isn’t the first time the Robin Hood analogy has been used in the wrong way.

Speaking at a rally in Stamford, Connecticut, President Obama attacked Mitt Romney’s economic plan during the 2012 election cycle by referencing Robin Hood. The president blamed “the uncompromising view that says we should be going back to the old top-down economics that got us into this mess in the first place.”

He contrasted his own tax and spend plan with Romney’s $5 trillion tax cut. “It’s like Robin Hood in reverse — it’s Romney-hood.” Of course, the partisan and ignorant crowd laughed and roared and whistled its approval of the equally ignorant words of the president.

This line from The Hill caught my attention:

“If Obama is casting himself as the hero, he also hopes to cast newly empowered congressional Republicans as the villains — multiple Sheriffs of Nottingham defending the rich and influential.”

The Sheriffs of Nottingham were protecting the government against the people. “As Robin explains to one villager,” in The Adventures of Robin Hood TV series (1955-1960), “‘These are strange times, Hawkins, when the sheriff protects those who steal and brands as thieves those who return the stolen goods.’”

A good place to start to know the real Robin Hood is the TV-show ballad that still plays in my head:

Robin Hood! Robin Hood! Riding through the glen!
Robin Hood! Robin Hood! With his band of men!
Feared by the bad! Loved by the good!
Robin Hood! Robin Hood! Robin Hood!

Who were the “bad” that feared Robin and his “band of men”? It wasn’t the entrepreneurs, shop owners, and business owners; it was the government officials and their cronies who were taxing the people and abusing their political offices.

Robin dedicated himself to helping “the people of the king,” not by calling on the king to increase taxes on the rich but to stop governmental tyranny.

Notice where most of the scenes in this trailer for The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) film take place – the halls of government (with a few love scenes thrown in for box office reasons):

Robin Hood was for the little guy against an all-power government that used chicanery, deceit, and plain old corruption to rob the people of the product of their labor.

Robin was against the political tyrants, most notably Prince John, Sir Guy of Gisbourne, and the sheriffs who extracted taxes from the common people to pay the king so he and his cronies could retain their political positions.

The common people were starving because of the king’s taxes and growing land acquisition. The people had no place to hunt because the government had cut off access to productive lands. Similar things are happening today as governments come in and regulate water sources, deny building permits, curtail the coal industry, and put up obstacles that would give the United States energy independence.

This is not to say that some business owners and large corporations are guiltless. They have often joined with the government in order to carve out special economic favors and bailouts for business failures while the average business owner is left holding the bag. Sen. Cruz made this striking point:

You notice, Bernie is going to tell you all this free stuff he’s going to give. And the Democrats love corporate welfare. They love to rail on the insurance companies. What they won’t tell you is that, under ObamaCare, the profits for the insurance companies doubled. When you have Washington giving out goodies, the big guys do great. It’s the little people who hurt. It’s the young people, it’s the entrepreneurs.

If a Robin Hood movie were being cast today, Bernie Sanders would be Prince John. The producers would have their pick of securing a supporting cast for Prince John’s court of governmental thieves by any number of Democrat advisers, congressmen, and senators from both major political parties.

Previous post

Does it really pay to be a nice guy?

Next post

Millennials Are Turning to Witchcraft and Sorcery